2025
"[They provide] competent, strategic advice and are efficient."
"Taylor Wessing is a fair partner for clients. They have wide experience in IP matters. We like their approach to checking what the client wants and what the budget allows. Thus, clients are not driven into costs which they are not willing or almost not able to pay."
"Quick, pragmatic and on-point advice, good communication."
A client appreciates the team's "very efficient collaboration".
"Very competent, swift and to-the-point advice and assistance."
"Honest, extremely client-oriented, and not arrogant."
"Taylor Wessing is very knowledgeable in both pharma patent litigation and procedural manoeuvres before the UPC."
"Fast, clear, and friendly strategy."
"The team is not only highly reliable but also always highly responsive and open to in-depth discussions. We particularly value the collaborative approach of strategy development. It is always a pleasure to have fruitful and open discussions and to work with them on finding the best solutions."
"They are responsive and capable of meeting tight deadlines. Their expertise in both legal and technical aspects ensures that we communicate very well.
"They are open to comparing French and German approaches to patent litigation. It is fluid to work with them; they listen to our arguments, and they are receptive to original arguments derived from our practice before the EPO and French judges."
"Extremely business- and cost-oriented advice. They keep in mind who the client is, their IP knowledge, budget, and what the risks and chances are."
A client appreciates the team's "responsiveness and clarity in their advice".
"Extremely tenacious and strong in court hearings."
"Commercially aware lawyers with deep knowledge of the relevant IP areas, excellent drafting, and energetic at prosecuting their client's rights."
2023
"The team are reliable, responsive and good quality, and they provide good communication."
"The team is high quality, high experience and very reliable."
"We appreciate the on-point counselling."
"We appreciate their diligence and good responsiveness and excellent human networks with a variety of experts. Also, they have good capacity in relevant practice areas like unfair competition law and media law."
